just because he did good in the regular season does not make him mvp..i think it should be nash
5/11/2007 9:56 AM ET
HE WAS DEFINETLY A CANDIDATE BUT DOESNT LOOK LIKE HE CAN HOLD UP WHEN HIS TEAM NEEDS HIM....THAT DOESNT SOUND VERY VALUABLE TO ME...NASH SHOULD HAVE GOT IT...
5/11/2007 5:46 PM ET
I never thought dirk deserved it. they need to stop choosing the winner byt the best player on the best team way, they need to go by who is the most dominant player, the most valuable to his team, the overall best player. But its always going to people who shouldnt get it, this year kobe shouldve, last year lebron shouldve, ans the year b4 shouldve been iverson. im not saying that the winners of the year before shouldnt get respect but come on.
5/11/2007 7:03 PM ET
No way Dirk didn't deserve it at all just because his team had the best record and he was the best on that team dosen't mean he deserves it but like kb244mvp07 said it should be the most dominant player the best overall player and in my mind was Kobe
5/11/2007 8:58 PM ET
Kobe will never get it because they hatin him cause of colorado(mikealsky28)hater...But hes not in the running against Jordan. hes in the running against Nowitski and nash and neither one can come close to his talent...MVP is subjective..Titles are earned..Does nash have one, no..What about dirk, no! So all kobe haters shut da f**k up cause u know hes the man(mikealsky28)..Til they get a ring, u cant say s***!!
5/11/2007 11:19 PM ET
I believe kobe deserved it the last two year in a row..he has had historic two years in statistic and in play...he became a leader this year more then just a scorer..but yet again his team didnt step up the way they were supposed to...so he couldnt get it.I think its bulshit that he hasnt gotten it either of the last two years.At least one of the years he should have gotten it.
5/12/2007 11:46 AM ET
Hey mario.. nash isnt the best player on his team either, hes the best decisionmaker...So even with the slim chance they have of winning a title..Hes just their decisionmaker, not their best player....PS. shaq wasnt makin clutch shots in the end of games, or free throws..Kobe was..he took the lead when it counted most...
5/12/2007 12:27 PM ET
HEY GENIUS....KOBE MAY HAVE RINGS BUT HE WON THOSE RINGS AS THE 2ND BEST PLAYER ON HIS TEAM. SHAQ LED THEM TO THOSE RINGS, NOT KOBE.
5/12/2007 1:01 PM ET
While Kobes Rings did come with shaq, could shaq have gotten them without Kobe? i dont think so, kobe and shaq for that 3 year run were like a 21st century jordan and pippen. They had talent, rings, excitement.
5/12/2007 1:08 PM ET
Hopefully this will stop the voters from just giving it to the best player on the team with the best record. This wasn't even a career year for him he has had better years. Kobe, Nash, TMAC, even Lebron had better years than him. Also his team had the best record because his team was healthy all year or else they would of been third in the West.
5/14/2007 12:56 PM ET
