Both didnt have the best series,but i think kobe had the netter finals cuz he at least won a couple games,and also he had at least 1 great game when he scored 36 and got his team a win.LeBron did average 22 7 rebs and 6.8 assists,but at least the Lkaers were IN the series,the Cavs were never in it,and they got SWEPT by a better team.The Lakers are a better team than the Cavs were,but they did at least put up a fight.LeBRon had 23 turnover in the series...Im not just coming dwon on him,i just gotta find kobes stats to compare.Both had a BAd series though.But they were against great defensive teams

both didnt win but kobe clearly played better. at least the lakers won 2 games instead of being swept

Yeah...now its time to reach into the past and bash on LeBron, making Kobe look better. Typical Laker fans.

Lebron losing was no big deal because nobody expected him to win so his reputation actually benefited from it since hes so young. Most people thought Kobe would have won, they thought it was just a 4 year timeout from his last title and him and phil would resume where the dynasty left off. Well,they were all wrong because Kobe didnt even look like a All-star and will be remembered for his timid demeanor and in a sense waiving the white flag in surrender. The Lakers broke 2 finals records that are probably the 2 records nobody would wanna own. Lebron will be back again and will eventually win one,where i dont expect Kobe to ever get another title unless a miracle occurs.

I would love to see that,because Kobe would be coming off the bench LOL, just kidding Laker zealots.