I think T.O. is more valuable.Tom Brady had great years without moss.He just makes a great Qb better.I still think the Pats would be a great team without him,they still have talented Wrs.And you see wh@T Tom Brady did last year with no really great receivers.Without T.O.,I just dont see the cowboys being as good they are now.Especially with the injury to Terry Glenn,this year their receiving core would not be to good.You see wat T.O. did on sunday,he had all 4 cowboy scores.He can take over games like that.He makes Tony Romo WAY better.He adds lots of pressure to defenses as they have to gameplan for him and Jason Witten.He IS more valuable to his team.

TO even though Randy Moss is better TO is more valuable to his team. TO is key to the Cowboys success.

RANDY JUST HAS THE BETTER QB BUT T.O. HAS NEVER BEEN OFF WHEN RANDY PLAYED FOR THE RAIDERS HE JUST LOOKED LIKE HE QUIT LIKE HE DIDNT WANT TO PLAY T.O HAD ALOT OF BEEF WITH PLAYERS IN PHILLY AND THE COACHES BUT HE STILL GAVE HIS ALL AND DARRODPC MOSS DOESNT DROP BALLS LIKE T.O. ARE YOU SURE ABOUT THAT HE DROPPED A THIRD DOWN PASS AND A TOUCH DOWN PASS LAST NIGHT AT BALTIMORE AND DID YOU SEE WHAT BRADY DID WITH RECHE CALDWELL LAST YEAR HE TURNED A NOBODY INTO A SOMEBODY T.O. IS DEFINETELY MORE VALUABLE BECAUSE BRADY HAS WELKER AND STALLWORTH WHICH ARE TWO GREAT WIDEOUT'S AND JABAR GAFNEY ALL ROMO HAS IS CRAYTON AND WITTEN BESIDES T.O. BECAUSE GLENN IS OUT AND EVERYONE KNOWS CRAYTON AND WITTEN CANT COMPARE TO THE RECIEVERS THAT BRADY HAS NO DOUBT ABOUT IT THAT T.O. IS BETTER AND MORE VALUABLE WONDER HOW MANY TD'S OWENS WOULD HAVE IF HE HAD BRADY AND IF MOSS WAS ON THE COWBOYS HE WOULD NOT TRY LIKE WHEN HE WAS ON THE RAIDERS THE ONLY THING I GIVE MOSS OVER OWENS IS ELEVATION

That is a two part question. I know Randy Moss is butter, but with or without him New England will win, Tom Brady will make a nobody a superstar,however Dallas needs TO