WELL MJ WAS BASICALLY IN THIS ERA AS WELL, IT WAS TEN YEARS AGO BUT HE IS PROBABLY ONE OF THE ONLY ONES WHO CAN BE DOMINANT. A FEW THAT I THINK COULD MATCH THEIR QUICKNESS AND ATHELETICISM IS MJ, DOMINIQUE WILKINS, MAYBE CLYDE DREXLER, BUT THERE ARENT MANY
7/9/2007 12:07 AM ET
i think larry could stick wit em, magic,kareem would dominate,isiah
7/9/2007 2:20 AM ET
Some of the all-time greats of course would still be all stars in with today's game. Pistol Pete, Slilt, Bird, the Logo to name a few. Basketball is simple. If you have the fundamentals you can play with anyone. There's 5 on the floor. You can't tell me Nash is bigger, stronger and more athletic than yester-year's players... oh yeah he only won back to back MVPs in 05 & 06.
7/9/2007 8:09 AM ET
I think magic, bird and jordan would still dominate the league...Isiah would struggle....
7/11/2007 12:13 PM ET
 |
absolutely NOT, there are a few who can compete, but none of them can match the quickness and athleticism of todays NBA Players
7/9/2007 12:40 AM ET
No way. Athletes today are getting bigger, stronger, faster then before. And its not like everyone says they got less talent and skill dats simpley not true. Like, they say the pitchers not adays would lose to the old school ones because old school had alot more skill. For example in football 100years ago, the avg was probably 5"8ish, 185 was huge. Now adays 185 is like a kid. Avg is above 6ft, and they bench much more, and are much much faster, and tougher. So as much as i want to say Hank Arron, or Bird would not do as good as they would in todays game, although Mj would still be a great player, he was ahead of his time but he wouldnt be known as he is now if this "era" was his time
7/9/2007 2:09 AM ET
|
